The book Maus was very different than the book we just read, Into the Wild. The obvious reason being that it is in the form of a comic book. This book could have been written in a normal form with no pictures and could still have been easy to understand. I feel that writing this book in comic book form helped understand the main points better. I know that with pictures, I understand everything better. It’s an image in your head of what is going on. Also, since it is a comic book, it is more layed back to read and it reminds me of when i used to read comic books when I was little. I enjoyed reading this book mainly because it is in the form of a comic book. If the comic book was in the form of just a normal book with no pictures, I probably would have complained about it because I wouldnt want to have read it. I feel that having this book in the form of a comic book was an excellent idea and is better off than if it were in the normal book form. I feel that the author got his main points and theme across better with the graphics involved in the book.
I feel that there are a couple of good books that I have read that would work so well as a comic. But since it is so fresh in my head, I would have to say that Into the Wild would work good as a comic. It could show pictures of everywhere McCandless went. Also, since it was all about traveling, it would have maps from where he went each time he moved, which they kind of did on the novel. During McCandless’s adventures, I am unfamiliar with the lingo used in the wild so pictures would have helped me understand what he was doing and going through. They made the book into a movie, so making it into a comic book could easily be done. Plus, with the comic book, I think that the book would have a wider fan base towards younger kids.